K2 Vs Nintex workflows for SharePoint
| 
   
Areas 
 | 
  
   
K2 
 | 
  
   
Nintex 
 | 
 
| 
   
Business 
 | 
  
   
·        
  Good tool for
  representing processes visually  
·        
  Support for
  delivery of data to process approvers and other stakeholders that includes
  the information they need to perform their role in the process in a friendly
  format. Ability to show them the data they need to make a decision on a
  variety of devices, and to record their decisions. 
·        
  Good tools for
  monitoring and reporting process performance and identify delays. 
 | 
  
   
·        
  Nintex Workflow
  is GUI base and easy to use. It is suited for workflows that are not too
  complex. It would be great to have more in depth training and the user guide
  has room for improvement as well 
·        
  Nintex is a
  great tool for a logical, tech-minded individual without official development
  skills. 
 | 
 
| 
   
Support 
 | 
  
   
·        
  K2 as has best
  support and great community base 
 | 
  
   
·        
  Nintex lags in
  support 
 | 
 
| 
   
Advantages 
 | 
  
   
·        
  User friendly 
·        
  Reporting
  capability 
·        
  Auditing
  capability 
·        
  Workflow and
  business process management 
·        
  Line of
  Business Data integration 
·        
  Good for large
  data pulling 
·        
  Easy upgrade to
  new versions 
 | 
  
   
·        
  Non-technical
  users can implement somewhat complex solutions. 
·        
  Email
  notifications easy. 
·        
  Can see
  workflow task history visually. 
·        
  Administration
  for Nintex is easy 
 | 
 
| 
   
Disadvantages 
 | 
  
   
·        
  We
  found SharePoint's built-in process tools clumsy, hard to re-use, and
  not very powerful or flexible. 
·        
  Getting setup
  to where you're actually start using the product can be quiet complex and the
  instructions are not quite clear  
 | 
  
   
·        
  Error messages
  are completely vague, making it extremely difficult to debug. 
·        
  Failures occur
  for random reasons. 
·        
  Error
  notifications get sent out too frequently which confuse users. 
·        
  Have
  performance issue when pulling larger lists 
·        
  Support
  nightmare for failed workflows. 
 | 
 
| 
   
Cost 
 | 
  
   
·        
  K2 blackpearl
  (enterprise) has a fixed cost for unlimited users and servers 
 | 
  
   
·        
  Nintex has a
  price per web front-end.  This is key consideration when farming out
  multiple SharePoint front-ends. 
 | 
 
| 
   
Integration 
 | 
  
   
·        
  K2 blackpearl
  provides exclusive activity/event library addressing common systems and
  scenarios ( AD integration for user management, Exchange integration, SAP,
  Salesforce,SharePoint integration for actions such as document management,
  user management, CRM). It also provides excellent framework to connect to LOB
  systems using Smart Objects. This helps developer’s focus on core process
  logic than interface details. 
 | 
  
   
·        
  Nintex also
  is very tightly integrated with SharePoint and lacks integration ability to
  external LOB in the enterprise. 
·        
  It also
  connects to databases and CRM systems, or integrating your SharePoint content
  with social media platforms 
 | 
 
| 
   
Conclusion 
 | 
  
   
·        
  K2 is for
  medium to large budget, scaling to enterprise in IT pro-environment 
 | 
  
   
·        
  Nintex is best
  suited for small business solutions which deals with lesser data and business
  can easily create workflows without any developer 
 | 
 
.
